What Noam Chomsky had to say on Osama’s death…..


Here’s an interesting piece of contrasting view from the great intellect Noam Chomsky on the U.S. Raid that killed Osama Bin Laden. Most of the world and media have dubbed this as a glorifying and jubilant moment for the world but rarely have seen the deep underlying flaws and paradoxes of the operation geronimo.It is a must read piece:

My reaction to Osama Bin Laden’s Death…….

It’s increasingly clear that operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms international law. There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim,as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos. facing virtually no opposition -except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress “suspects”. In April 2002, the head of the FBI Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know eight months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban ( how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite Bin Laden if they were presented with evidence –which as we soon learned Washington didn’t have. Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Queda.”

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of Bin Laden’s “confession,” but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.
There is also much media dscussion of Washington’s anger that Pakistan didn’t turn over bin Laden, though surely elements of military and security forces were aware of his presence in Abbottabad. Less is said about Pakistani anger that the US invaded their territory to carry out a political assassination. Anti-American fervor is already very high in Pakistan, and these events are likely to exacerbate it. The decision to dump the body at sea is already, predictably, provoking both anger and skepticism in much of the Muslim world.

We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic. Uncontroversially, his crimes vastly exceed bin Laden’s, and he is not a “suspect” but uncontroversially the “decider” who gave the orders to commit the “supreme international crime differing from only other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” (quoting the Nuremberg Tribunal) for which Nazi criminals were hanged: the hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of refugees, destruction of much of the country, the bitter sectarian conflict that has now spread to the rest of the region.
There’s more to say about [Cuban Airline bomber Orlando] Bosch, who just died peacefully in Florida, including reference to the “Bush Doctrine” that societies that harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves and should be treated accordingly. No one seemed to notice that Bush was calling for invasion and destruction of the US and murder of its criminal president.

Same with the name, Operation Geronimo. The imperial mentality is so profound, throughout western society, that no one can perceive that they are glorifying bin Laden by identifying him with courageous resistance against genocidal invaders.

There is much more to say, even the most obvious and elementary facts should provide us with a good deal to think about.

THE GENERAL OBSESSIONS WITH WESTERN CULTURE….


Imperialism necessarily doesn’t mean to invade one’s land or nations and subsequently have its influence. But the real imperialism starts when the psychology of certain groups of people is invaded by other group of persons. The impact of this is the trend that eventually becomes inevitable that at the some point it poses the serious threat to one’s own identity, culture, social values and norms.

Still we have the perception of treating “white” skin as added or special privilege that we generally associate with westerners. Our mind is conditioned with the idea that westerners are really fortunate people than us. To make those perceptions more fervent our mind associates them with their high quality of life, their abundance wealth and development. The consequence of this is our general inclinations to their every aspects of life. We like to talk, wear, socialize, earn and even think like them. The merits and discrepancies of this effect is the matter of discourse which shall not be disclosed here. The main thing that is focused here is our pure obsessions to the western culture like the language I am writing for this article can be taken as an obsession.

Needless to say that each nation has its own specialty and identity. But, in this age of modernism the value of one’s identity seems to be marred by some outside influence. If this trend continues then we shall never be different from the westerners besides some aspects. Our conception of modernism is greatly tilted towards the western culture. Whatever they innovate with their culture becomes the tag of modernism but we overlook our own culture because we pertain our culture to be conventional and never think of way making it more improvised in it’s form. It is futile to point the general dresses we wear as our own dresses have the vent only for some very special occasions otherwise who cares. Not only with dresses, our obsessions has such intensity that we pretend to sound like them when we speak, give more preferences to western movies and songs. If someone is seen to be more devoted in his/her culture we jeer such person saying “pakhe”. May be the advent of internet has facilitated the encroachment of the cultures in the name of globalisation. If this is to continue then we will have nothing to say our own.

Some transformation of culture has special significance to our lives but when someone gets completely drenched with obsession then the person becomes blindfolded. When this happens then along with good and sober some bad and very radical attitudes in the culture is seen. Hippies and punks are the good examples of this. Just think in the deep rooted society on the matter of conventionalism like ours if get exposed with our own girls wearing very tight and short miniskirts then where will the values of our dresses like sari, gunyo choli go? It can’t be perceived in other senses rather than obnoxious. Until and unless we prioritize our own culture and values our preconceived classical conditioning towards the western culture wil have very devastating impact in our own cultures.

The Gruesome Picture of Mental Health In Nepal…….


Mental Health Of Nepal is probably the most affected and offhanded sector. The below data shows the urgent need to overhaul the whole mental health situation, policy and strategy in Nepal:

*20 per cent of the population is affected by some form of mental disorder, and this dwarfs any other disease
* Yet, only 0.15 per cent of the health care budget is spent on mental health
* There are only 40 licensed psychiatrists and five clinical psychologists for a population of 28 million people
* Traditional healers are primary care givers
* There is extreme stigmatisation and ostracisation
* Mental health is a human rights issue because many patients are sent to jail because of their illness
* Mental health is not a priority for the donor community
* Out of six people with disabilities, four have mental disorders.
* The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed in May this year to promote the human rights of people living with mental or physical disabilities.

Reference:from the article of Jagannath Lamichhane